Survey results 2013: Dodd-Frank impact is starting to hit home!

May 16, 2013

The recent MoneyMate Data Management 2013 survey has some interesting insights into what is happening on the ground in 2013.

First up was a question on regulation - What regulations are impacting your firm’s operations the most in 2013?

Dodd-Frank topped the poll at 51%, which is high when you consider the respondents in the survey came from both sides of the Atlantic. Heretofore, many firms had indicated that Dodd-Frank was their chief concern – this was from a future impact perspective. The 2013 survey is indicating that this is now actually hitting home when it comes to day-to-day operations in 2013. If anything, I expect the impact of Dodd-Frank to grow and would expect next years survey to reflect that.

Another interesting finding in the survey is that 41% of the survey respondents have had an operational impact in 2013 with respect to preparing for FATCA, one can imagine what the impact will be once FATCA hits home fully. RDR was another notable hot spot  with 30% of respondents highlighting it as something that was having a real impact in 2013. UCITS IV and Solvency II polled 36% and 21% respectively indicating European regulation is still a hot topic – even if EIOPA and the EU council have delayed the full deployment of the Solvency II framework. Interestingly, I have heard on the ground that RMORSA in the US is starting to surface as an issue for institutional managers with demands for more holding level transparency, including demands for look-through in multilevel portfolios e.g. fund-of-fund like structures. It will be interesting to see if RMORSA surfaces as a key trend in 2014 and it is something I will be keeping an eye on as 2013 rolls on.


The Changing Investor Landscape

November 30, 2012

The fund distribution, sales and marketing landscape is changing rapidly, which in turn is leading to significant shifts in how asset management firms are facing their product data management challenges. Applying a formal data quality management process to investment product data was not always the highest priority in the data governance programs in place in most US and European asset management firms – but this is not the case any longer.

The sales networks are becoming dis-intermediated, which is driving needs within distribution and marketing to develop a closer more trustful relationship with distributors and end investors. The impending RDR directive in the UK is, in my opinion, a sign of things to come – the world is looking on to see how the UK market reacts to the withdrawal of commission-led incentives within the advisor community, what is obvious is that firms are upping the ante when it comes to promotion of their products, often specifically highlighting the depth, breadth and timeliness of their product data communications as a reference for how trustworthy the firm is. Lobbyists in the US who have resisted moves to implement a similar regime on the other side of the Atlantic must be looking on with trepidation and a certain amount of fear, as it appears the RDR is not going to be the disaster for the industry many had feared. Certainly, many financial advisers have decided to retire rather than re-educate themselves or seek the correct certification to allow them continue their current business activity – some asset managers have dipped into the market to purchase a once independent network, and in doing so transforming it to a tied network of agents to preserve their channels for routing product to end investors.

Performance is no longer the king it once was – the playing field has been levelled significantly and the discerning distribution networks and end investors are seeking out firms and products in which have significant levels of trust. Trust is built in many ways, so consider the following points in preparation for the new landscape:

-          While brand was always a key decision criteria in the investment process, it will become even more so – hence protection of investment in brand will become paramount – do not allow your brand be dragged into the mire by shoddy data publication processes that make you a target of the regulators who are only delighted to launch PR campaigns to demonstrate how they are protecting the interests of the main street from the perceived avarice of Wall Street.

-          Depth and breadth of data availability was always a key criteria for institutional investors – this trend is now prevalent in the retail community as investors become more savvy and discerning – ensure you have an investment product data strategy which unlocks the availability of the full breath of quantitative risk and performance attribution data for both equity and fixed income lines. Be careful though, unlocking Pandora’s box without advisors and investors alike having a correct level of education and training about the products is a potential landmine – consider also the qualitative data available – investors who are bamboozled by statistics need to understand the human element of the fund – promote the fund management team and their outlook and philosophy

-          Timely access to data will become critical not just in keeping investors happy – but also regulators – there is an unprecedented wave of regulation coming our way, with demands for ever-increasing levels of transparency at the macro (firm) and micro (fund-specific e.g. holdings) levels

-          The web is the firm’s shop window – if your web and social media experiences are damp squib experiences, do not expect to excite or retain your investors – the new investor market is the Google and iPhone generation, so your marketing strategies need to be ready now to grab a slice of the inflows.

 So the key takeaways are:

– ensure your firm’s strategy and governance programs have a focussed stream on Investment product data management

– ensure you have a dynamic flexible technology framework that is capable of reacting to the current and future needs of the distribution network, the end investor and the regulator alike

 – the landscape is changing and it is changing fast – don’t be left behind.


Recent webcast survey results – update #3

September 13, 2012

Following on from my previous blogs, the third question we asked in the survey during my recent webcast was “Which regulation is causing you most concern?

The result set had 5 options:

- Retail Distribution Review (UK)

- Solvency II (Europe/ Global)

- UCITS V / KID / KIID (Europe)

- FATCA (US / Global)

- Other….

As I would have expected, respondents indicated Solvency II is the regulation that is causing them most concern.

What I was a little surprised with, was that FATCA, RDR and UCITS V/KID were all equally ‘second’ the terms of concern. Specifically what surprised me was that FATCA was not the stand-out focus behind Solvency II.

I can honestly say that in my 13+ years operating in this market I have never seen a piece of regulation have such a profound impact as that which Solvency II is having today. Now clearly if your domain of focus is T/A and maintenance of share/unit holder records then FATCA is without doubt having a life changing impact on your business – but for the rest, Solvency II is a game changer.

What is most disconcerting though is that Solvency II is a piece of regulation that emanates from the European insurance industry, yet it is having a global impact on investment management businesses which are exposed to existing insurer-led mandates, or which have a specific institutional focus on attracting insurer AUM.

For many investment managers there is a lot of well-founded fear of the unknown, because while at face value their direct book of record may not indicate a large exposure to insurer investments, many are completely unaware of their indirect exposure via e.g. fund-of-fund investors which in turn have exposure to the insurance industry.

I was not surprised that RDR featured in joint second place in the response – this correlates strongly with the upcoming enforcement, same for UCITS V – this has a lot of visibility  as there have been updates from Brussels last month that elaborated on previous information updates.

There was a high percentage of ‘other’ in the response and I understand that this may relate to EMIR (European Market Infrastructure Regulation) which I will cover some other time.

In my next post I will consider the final question in the survey “What is your biggest challenge in getting your investment product data to market?

Talk soon….


Webcast available for on-demand playback…

August 10, 2012

For those of you who missed the recent webcast on regulation and its impact on data management strategies in the investment fund world, it is available for playback here


Webcast: The impact of upcoming regulation on data management

July 18, 2012

I am hosting a webcast on “The Impact of Upcoming Regulation on Data Management” on Wednesday 25th July 2012, 3pm BST, 10am EST.

Regulation is a key challenge in the industry and in an unprecedented age of openness and transparency continues to be the no. 1 driver for asset managers investing in data and reporting initiatives. Companies want to mitigate the risk of inaccurate information being in the public domain and many are embarking on data management projects – which will save time, reduce errors and automate processes. The key themes we see center on capability to deliver a systematic, repeatable and auditable data publication process for client-facing data.

This webcast will be presented by myself, and will focus on how upcoming regulations will impact the industry and how asset managers need to prepare to ensure they stay ahead in a highly competitive market. Specific topics to be covered include: the latest version of AIFMD, the final throes of the Retail Distribution Review, the latest on KIID for PRIPS, UCITS V, how being important or “SIFI” is no longer so desirable, Volcker, FATCA and last but certainly not least Pillar III of Solvency II.

Finally, I will touch on what is around the corner and run through some recommendations with respect to preparing for the swathe of upcoming regulatory change.

To register for this webcast please click here.

I look forward to welcoming you online on July 25th.


Getting the house in order for a post RDR world

November 30, 2011

2012 is set to be a dynamic year in the financial advisory sector. With the FSA’s Retail Distribution Review (RDR) coming into effect in December 2012, IFAs have to up the ante with standardised professional qualifications and increased transparency of charges and services. With time running out to comply, it is not a matter of when, but how to prepare for RDR. In fact I recently attended FIMA Europe in London which echoed this trend. Post-RDR preparation is the number one priority for internal investment within asset management and advisory firms next year.

The requirements of RDR have also meant that companies’ sales and marketing teams are demanding precise and timely investment product information to support new distribution channels. This includes having in depth information at their fingertips to develop slicker, more accurate and timely product sheets. This helps to build the level of investor trust and enhance client service by ensuring consistency of information across a company’s website and its product data sheets.

 Therefore arming financial advisers and asset managers with real-time accessibility of fund product information is the first step needed to demonstrate the necessary transparency required for RDR.  Putting in place a platform that gives investors a current product view is essential. This platform must be able to pull up-to-date, accurate data immediately. It also lays the groundwork to build the level of client trust. The companies that have invested in intelligent communications infrastructure and platforms will be the ones better positioned to stay ahead in a highly competitive market.

Ultimately, taking a forward-looking approach to RDR will be paramount. My advice? Putting the right risk mitigation and regulatory compliance tools in place ensures effective data governance, builds client trust and importantly helps maintain a competitive edge.


Regulation.. what’s going on.

May 23, 2011

Following my last couple of blogs on the results of our survey around data management and regulation,  I said I would post some information about the various regulations in each region and how they were likely to impact..

In North America, the regulators have always been to a large extent more rules than principles-based – this is not going to change – and – in the future we can in fact expect even more rules – not less.  

The US alternatives space has seen many changes,  particularly around registration, where many hedge fund managers now required to register with the SEC would previously have been exempt – this is causing many European hedge fund operators to consider their long-term strategy in the US. The implication of registration is that full books have to be maintained. Each firm must retain all data, and be able to produce records for SEC inspection. SEC examination is a particularly onerous process – with site visits, extensive questionnaires and vast demands for data.     

The movement of the Dodd-Frank bill through the senate in summer 2010 ushered in a new era of regulation in the US, and we expect to see major changes to issues such as  corporate governance, executive compensation and levels of disclosure and transparency. What we do not know yet  is how the bill will directly impact the many rules we expect to see the SEC deliver, but we do know that the bill will allow the regulators to wield significant power and to determine the level of impact it will have on the market.

With the establishment of the Financial Stability Oversight Council and the Office of Financial Research, there is likely to be a more active approach to the management of market risk. This will manifest itself in increased reporting by asset management firms and funds on areas such as financial accounts, performance data, concentrations of risk  and exposures to third parties.  Increased demands for disclosure and transparency, including filing of full portfolios could also be seen, and there may also be  demands for SEC mandated slices and views of the portfolio breakdown. Recent changes by the SEC to Money Market funds with the updates to 2a-7 are perhaps the clearest insight we have as to what to expect for the broader investment fund market – based on what we see in 2a-7 we might expect to see more rules on post trade compliance, public information filing and risk exposures.   

Meanwhile, FINRA will be continuing to focus on maintaining market integrity, protecting investors and implementing key strands of the Consumer Protection Act within the Dodd-Frank reforms.   

In Canada,  a large segment of the industry is focussed on the new ‘Point of Sale’ fund fact documents which must be presented to investors prior to writing any investment from as early as July of this year.    

Europe

European regulators are moving toward the North American model of regulation. So what was mostly regulation by principle will become regulation by rule. Tensions and strains within the EU came to the fore with French led demands for a move away from ‘light touch’ to ‘heavy touch’ winning out. Ironically though, the UK regulatory environment is probably the most rules-based of the current batch – I think it will become even more rules oriented , especially now that the FSA comes under the remit of the Bank of England.

Most discussion in the City these days though is about RDR and how the removal of commission incentives is re-shaping the sales/advice arena , with many Asset Managers now actively looking at IFA businesses and other distribution channels to give them access to the market.  

On the cross-border front, the big news is the UCITS IV directive,  and from a data management perspective the key discussion point is the KIID – or Key Investor Information Document.  The KIID much like the CSA’s Fund Facts, is a simple 2-page document that should be delivered to the investor prior to investment. With KIID I see some serious data management challenges, in particular with the scale of the narrative data management, while the quant data should be more straightforward to deal with. To complement the rollout of the KIID initiative, Germany has passed legislation mandating the delivery of ‘product information sheets’ for investment products which are not covered by UCITS IV.

On the offshore side of things, we are already seeing change in Luxembourg and Ireland – in particular Ireland where we have seen the arrival of Matthew Elderfield, a former FSA department head.   

The rise of the ‘Newcit’ – ostensibly a hedge fund in UCITS clothing – is creating a lot of regulatory discussion – while welcoming the on-shoring of some hedge funds, it is thought that many of the ESMA regulators hope that hedge funds will migrate towards the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive.

That’s a quick summary of the regulations I think will impact reporting and therefore might cause data management issues. We’re still seeing regulation as the major hot topic at industry conferences – everyone is talking about it and trying to get prepared for change.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 26 other followers