Survey results 2013: Dodd-Frank impact is starting to hit home!

May 16, 2013

The recent MoneyMate Data Management 2013 survey has some interesting insights into what is happening on the ground in 2013.

First up was a question on regulation - What regulations are impacting your firm’s operations the most in 2013?

Dodd-Frank topped the poll at 51%, which is high when you consider the respondents in the survey came from both sides of the Atlantic. Heretofore, many firms had indicated that Dodd-Frank was their chief concern – this was from a future impact perspective. The 2013 survey is indicating that this is now actually hitting home when it comes to day-to-day operations in 2013. If anything, I expect the impact of Dodd-Frank to grow and would expect next years survey to reflect that.

Another interesting finding in the survey is that 41% of the survey respondents have had an operational impact in 2013 with respect to preparing for FATCA, one can imagine what the impact will be once FATCA hits home fully. RDR was another notable hot spot  with 30% of respondents highlighting it as something that was having a real impact in 2013. UCITS IV and Solvency II polled 36% and 21% respectively indicating European regulation is still a hot topic – even if EIOPA and the EU council have delayed the full deployment of the Solvency II framework. Interestingly, I have heard on the ground that RMORSA in the US is starting to surface as an issue for institutional managers with demands for more holding level transparency, including demands for look-through in multilevel portfolios e.g. fund-of-fund like structures. It will be interesting to see if RMORSA surfaces as a key trend in 2014 and it is something I will be keeping an eye on as 2013 rolls on.


Recent webcast survey results – update #3

September 13, 2012

Following on from my previous blogs, the third question we asked in the survey during my recent webcast was “Which regulation is causing you most concern?

The result set had 5 options:

- Retail Distribution Review (UK)

- Solvency II (Europe/ Global)

- UCITS V / KID / KIID (Europe)

- FATCA (US / Global)

- Other….

As I would have expected, respondents indicated Solvency II is the regulation that is causing them most concern.

What I was a little surprised with, was that FATCA, RDR and UCITS V/KID were all equally ‘second’ the terms of concern. Specifically what surprised me was that FATCA was not the stand-out focus behind Solvency II.

I can honestly say that in my 13+ years operating in this market I have never seen a piece of regulation have such a profound impact as that which Solvency II is having today. Now clearly if your domain of focus is T/A and maintenance of share/unit holder records then FATCA is without doubt having a life changing impact on your business – but for the rest, Solvency II is a game changer.

What is most disconcerting though is that Solvency II is a piece of regulation that emanates from the European insurance industry, yet it is having a global impact on investment management businesses which are exposed to existing insurer-led mandates, or which have a specific institutional focus on attracting insurer AUM.

For many investment managers there is a lot of well-founded fear of the unknown, because while at face value their direct book of record may not indicate a large exposure to insurer investments, many are completely unaware of their indirect exposure via e.g. fund-of-fund investors which in turn have exposure to the insurance industry.

I was not surprised that RDR featured in joint second place in the response – this correlates strongly with the upcoming enforcement, same for UCITS V – this has a lot of visibility  as there have been updates from Brussels last month that elaborated on previous information updates.

There was a high percentage of ‘other’ in the response and I understand that this may relate to EMIR (European Market Infrastructure Regulation) which I will cover some other time.

In my next post I will consider the final question in the survey “What is your biggest challenge in getting your investment product data to market?

Talk soon….


On Regulation: New KID in town (….soon)

August 23, 2012

This year we have witnessed the flood of Key Investor Information Documents for UCITS  in the marketplace, yet the bigwigs in the EU are already now proposing to broaden the initiative, and are proposing the production of a new KID (Key Investor Document) for all Packaged Retail Investment Products – or – PRIPS for short.

Since the definition of a PRIP encompasses UCITS funds, this new requirement will also apply to UCITS – although Brussels indicates a five year derogation will apply to UCITS to allow them get over the old KIID experience! The ultimate aim is, however, for all investment products to be accompanied by new KIDs in an attempt to make all investment products as comparable as possible.

The new KID will differ from the old KIID on a number of points, and really these differences will exist only to encompass the various  investment product flavours that fall under the PRIPS umbrella, hence the old KIID was deemed to be not fit for purpose.

The new KID documents will be expected to contain answers to a set of “standard” questions. The Commission says these include:

  • What is the investment?
  • Can I lose money?
  • What are the risks and what might I get back?
  • What are the costs?

The new KID, like the old document, will contain a risk indicator directly comparable with the synthetic risk and reward indicator for UCITS.

The new documents will also include information on the real costs of the various products – so that they can be compared in a neutral and objective way.

So the new documents will be broadly similar to existing KIID documents, but there will be specific changes to account for the fact that UCITS have properties that other investments do not have, and likewise there are other investment vehicles that have features and design elements not found in UCITS, such as insurance benefits or fixed investment terms.

Firms which have already gone through the mill with KIIDs for UCITS,  and have invested in their data management and document production infrastructure will be better positioned to deal with rolling out the new KIDs across all of their investment products, but those who have not…. well they are in for a rude awakening – as 2012 has been a really tough year for many on the KIID front!  So we can expect the data management impact of the new KID for PRIPS to be quite severe indeed.


Why are people surprised that regulation is causing so much upset right now?

August 13, 2012

Regulation is a really key topic of conversation within the investment fund industry, and not without good reason!

On a recent webcast I did on the impact of regulation on data management strategies in asset management I explored the reasons why the global regulatory community have received an enormous level of flak since the 2007/2008 market implosion.

Clearly, the charge levelled at the regulators is that they failed to maintain a stable market – by not having a clear view of the systemic and systematic market risks that were at play.

The result is that we are entering a period of unprecedented demand for oversight and transparency – with one of the key challenges being adoption and migration to operating models that can keep up with the rapid change of the industry landscape – without leaving behind a legacy of manual error prone processes and key knowledge data sets that are poorly maintained.

So it is not without reason that the media and investment community alike are keenly interested in the regulatory backlash that we are witnessing. Regulation was always a driver within the industry, but more recently its prominence has increased because the fines are getting bigger, and the reputational damage is all the greater, due to the increased coverage in the media.

Recent news articles on Ignites are indicating the level of frustration with regulation is growing e.g. today we say the headline “KIIDS an unhelpful distraction“, last week we saw “UCITS IV, V, VI…stop now, says the market

Over the coming days and weeks and I will explore this theme in-depth and publish some of the survey results from the webcast…


Webcast available for on-demand playback…

August 10, 2012

For those of you who missed the recent webcast on regulation and its impact on data management strategies in the investment fund world, it is available for playback here


Webcast: The impact of upcoming regulation on data management

July 18, 2012

I am hosting a webcast on “The Impact of Upcoming Regulation on Data Management” on Wednesday 25th July 2012, 3pm BST, 10am EST.

Regulation is a key challenge in the industry and in an unprecedented age of openness and transparency continues to be the no. 1 driver for asset managers investing in data and reporting initiatives. Companies want to mitigate the risk of inaccurate information being in the public domain and many are embarking on data management projects – which will save time, reduce errors and automate processes. The key themes we see center on capability to deliver a systematic, repeatable and auditable data publication process for client-facing data.

This webcast will be presented by myself, and will focus on how upcoming regulations will impact the industry and how asset managers need to prepare to ensure they stay ahead in a highly competitive market. Specific topics to be covered include: the latest version of AIFMD, the final throes of the Retail Distribution Review, the latest on KIID for PRIPS, UCITS V, how being important or “SIFI” is no longer so desirable, Volcker, FATCA and last but certainly not least Pillar III of Solvency II.

Finally, I will touch on what is around the corner and run through some recommendations with respect to preparing for the swathe of upcoming regulatory change.

To register for this webcast please click here.

I look forward to welcoming you online on July 25th.


Regulation.. what’s going on.

May 23, 2011

Following my last couple of blogs on the results of our survey around data management and regulation,  I said I would post some information about the various regulations in each region and how they were likely to impact..

In North America, the regulators have always been to a large extent more rules than principles-based – this is not going to change – and – in the future we can in fact expect even more rules – not less.  

The US alternatives space has seen many changes,  particularly around registration, where many hedge fund managers now required to register with the SEC would previously have been exempt – this is causing many European hedge fund operators to consider their long-term strategy in the US. The implication of registration is that full books have to be maintained. Each firm must retain all data, and be able to produce records for SEC inspection. SEC examination is a particularly onerous process – with site visits, extensive questionnaires and vast demands for data.     

The movement of the Dodd-Frank bill through the senate in summer 2010 ushered in a new era of regulation in the US, and we expect to see major changes to issues such as  corporate governance, executive compensation and levels of disclosure and transparency. What we do not know yet  is how the bill will directly impact the many rules we expect to see the SEC deliver, but we do know that the bill will allow the regulators to wield significant power and to determine the level of impact it will have on the market.

With the establishment of the Financial Stability Oversight Council and the Office of Financial Research, there is likely to be a more active approach to the management of market risk. This will manifest itself in increased reporting by asset management firms and funds on areas such as financial accounts, performance data, concentrations of risk  and exposures to third parties.  Increased demands for disclosure and transparency, including filing of full portfolios could also be seen, and there may also be  demands for SEC mandated slices and views of the portfolio breakdown. Recent changes by the SEC to Money Market funds with the updates to 2a-7 are perhaps the clearest insight we have as to what to expect for the broader investment fund market – based on what we see in 2a-7 we might expect to see more rules on post trade compliance, public information filing and risk exposures.   

Meanwhile, FINRA will be continuing to focus on maintaining market integrity, protecting investors and implementing key strands of the Consumer Protection Act within the Dodd-Frank reforms.   

In Canada,  a large segment of the industry is focussed on the new ‘Point of Sale’ fund fact documents which must be presented to investors prior to writing any investment from as early as July of this year.    

Europe

European regulators are moving toward the North American model of regulation. So what was mostly regulation by principle will become regulation by rule. Tensions and strains within the EU came to the fore with French led demands for a move away from ‘light touch’ to ‘heavy touch’ winning out. Ironically though, the UK regulatory environment is probably the most rules-based of the current batch – I think it will become even more rules oriented , especially now that the FSA comes under the remit of the Bank of England.

Most discussion in the City these days though is about RDR and how the removal of commission incentives is re-shaping the sales/advice arena , with many Asset Managers now actively looking at IFA businesses and other distribution channels to give them access to the market.  

On the cross-border front, the big news is the UCITS IV directive,  and from a data management perspective the key discussion point is the KIID – or Key Investor Information Document.  The KIID much like the CSA’s Fund Facts, is a simple 2-page document that should be delivered to the investor prior to investment. With KIID I see some serious data management challenges, in particular with the scale of the narrative data management, while the quant data should be more straightforward to deal with. To complement the rollout of the KIID initiative, Germany has passed legislation mandating the delivery of ‘product information sheets’ for investment products which are not covered by UCITS IV.

On the offshore side of things, we are already seeing change in Luxembourg and Ireland – in particular Ireland where we have seen the arrival of Matthew Elderfield, a former FSA department head.   

The rise of the ‘Newcit’ – ostensibly a hedge fund in UCITS clothing – is creating a lot of regulatory discussion – while welcoming the on-shoring of some hedge funds, it is thought that many of the ESMA regulators hope that hedge funds will migrate towards the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive.

That’s a quick summary of the regulations I think will impact reporting and therefore might cause data management issues. We’re still seeing regulation as the major hot topic at industry conferences – everyone is talking about it and trying to get prepared for change.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 27 other followers