Survey results 2013: Dodd-Frank impact is starting to hit home!

May 16, 2013

The recent MoneyMate Data Management 2013 survey has some interesting insights into what is happening on the ground in 2013.

First up was a question on regulation - What regulations are impacting your firm’s operations the most in 2013?

Dodd-Frank topped the poll at 51%, which is high when you consider the respondents in the survey came from both sides of the Atlantic. Heretofore, many firms had indicated that Dodd-Frank was their chief concern – this was from a future impact perspective. The 2013 survey is indicating that this is now actually hitting home when it comes to day-to-day operations in 2013. If anything, I expect the impact of Dodd-Frank to grow and would expect next years survey to reflect that.

Another interesting finding in the survey is that 41% of the survey respondents have had an operational impact in 2013 with respect to preparing for FATCA, one can imagine what the impact will be once FATCA hits home fully. RDR was another notable hot spot  with 30% of respondents highlighting it as something that was having a real impact in 2013. UCITS IV and Solvency II polled 36% and 21% respectively indicating European regulation is still a hot topic – even if EIOPA and the EU council have delayed the full deployment of the Solvency II framework. Interestingly, I have heard on the ground that RMORSA in the US is starting to surface as an issue for institutional managers with demands for more holding level transparency, including demands for look-through in multilevel portfolios e.g. fund-of-fund like structures. It will be interesting to see if RMORSA surfaces as a key trend in 2014 and it is something I will be keeping an eye on as 2013 rolls on.


Financial Technologies Forum LLC – FATCA Kills the Data Silo?

February 4, 2013

Interesting article on FTF about FATCA….Financial Technologies Forum LLC – FATCA Kills the Data Silo?.


Webcast: The impact of upcoming regulation on data management

July 18, 2012

I am hosting a webcast on “The Impact of Upcoming Regulation on Data Management” on Wednesday 25th July 2012, 3pm BST, 10am EST.

Regulation is a key challenge in the industry and in an unprecedented age of openness and transparency continues to be the no. 1 driver for asset managers investing in data and reporting initiatives. Companies want to mitigate the risk of inaccurate information being in the public domain and many are embarking on data management projects – which will save time, reduce errors and automate processes. The key themes we see center on capability to deliver a systematic, repeatable and auditable data publication process for client-facing data.

This webcast will be presented by myself, and will focus on how upcoming regulations will impact the industry and how asset managers need to prepare to ensure they stay ahead in a highly competitive market. Specific topics to be covered include: the latest version of AIFMD, the final throes of the Retail Distribution Review, the latest on KIID for PRIPS, UCITS V, how being important or “SIFI” is no longer so desirable, Volcker, FATCA and last but certainly not least Pillar III of Solvency II.

Finally, I will touch on what is around the corner and run through some recommendations with respect to preparing for the swathe of upcoming regulatory change.

To register for this webcast please click here.

I look forward to welcoming you online on July 25th.


On Regulation: FATCA

May 8, 2012

This post was recently published in TabbFORUM (26th April).

It is the second in a series of blogs that explore some upcoming or in-play regulation and its impact on the funds industry.

So what the FATCA is FATCA?

Well the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act to give it the full name treatment is in layman’s terms an attempt by the Internal Revenue Service  in the US to stem the loss of tax revenue as a result of US tax citizens attempting to avoid tax liability through investment in foreign investment companies and funds.

The IRS estimate that there is a $100bn in lost tax revenues that can be attributed to US citizens under reporting of offshore investments – the goal of FATCA is to force these investments into the open such that the IRS has full visibility which will in turn drive greater compliance with tax code.

How does FATCA impact the funds industry? Offshore asset management firms and funds will either be required to comply with FATCA by registering with the IRS i.e. sign an agreement with the IRS, either directly, or through a parent affiliation agreement (e.g. with their Parent entity) – or – they can choose to not register with the IRS.

What does FATCA registration mean for the fund in terms of actionable compliance?  In simple terms, it means the fund has to wade through its investors and clearly identify each as tax liable in the US or not. In addition, it must report to the IRS at least annually and comply with various requirements regarding due diligence and verification procedures in its FATCA-related processes. Finally, the fund must withhold 30% of any payment it makes to investors who cannot be clearly identified as non-US for tax purposes.

So funds could choose just not to register, right….? Well that all depends…if the fund invests in US securities and it decides to become a non-participating firm for FATCA purposes, then the fund will be liable for 30% withholding tax on any interest, dividend or sales proceeds on any US securities that it holds. In this case it is very much in the funds interest to be registered as a participating firm.

What about the asset managers transfer agent?  Does this mean the transfer agent has to comply? In simple terms, yes – the transfer agent needs to be affiliated to the fund or register themselves. In Europe, this is a problem for the transfer agent since lots of entries in the book are held in nominee (omnibus) accounts as there can be a myriad of distribution partners and feeder structures directing assets to the fund. So FATCA is clearly going to present some serious data management challenges as working through the nested layers of nominee accounts down to the actual investors – this is challenge for the fund, the transfer agent and any distributors or feeder structures to the fund.

So do all funds distributors need to be FATCA compliant? There is a choice – if the distributor is compliant there should be no problems – if the distributor is a non-participant then the fund needs to apply 30% withholding tax to all investors in this distributor.

So does this mean the fund is just an agent for the IRS?…It would seem so.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 26 other followers